Search Repository Universitas Fort De Kock

50% kejadian buruk pasien dapat dicegah, factor fisiologis manusia, kognitif dan perspektif
organisasi sangat mempengaruhi. Menurut WHO efek samping yang tidak diinginkan pada
pasien di dunia lebih kurang 10%. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui pasien safety. Desain
penelitian deskriptif analitik dengan multistage random sampling, Sample sebanyak 45 orang
sesuai dengan kriteria inklusi. Pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner. Hasil penelitian
menunjukkan Distribusi konflik pekerjaan negative ada 19 orang (42,2%), konflik positif ada
26 orang (57,8), distribusi manager tidak professional ada 19 orang (42,2%) dan manager yang
professional ada 26 orang (57,8). Distribusi komunikasi yang negatif ada 19 orang (42,2%) dan
komunikasi positif ada 26 orang (57,8). Laporan Suatu Kejadian tidak diinginkan mengatakan
tidak terlapor sebanyak 20 orang (44,4%),dan terlapor sebanyak 25 orang (55,6%). Peringkat
patient safety rendah sebanyak 14 orang (31,1%) dan patient safety tinggi ada 31 orang
(68,9%). Iklim kerja Rumah sakit tidak baik sebanyak 22 orang (48,9%)dan yang mengatakan
baik ada sebanyak 23 orang (51,1%). Kesimpulan dibutuhkan pembelajaran standar mencakup
pesan untuk diskusi dalam mengidentifikasi keselamatan dan laporan peristiwa keselamatan
pasien, menerapkan catatan mingguan untuk keselamatan pasien, melibatkan pasien, keluarga
dalam mengidentifikasi resiko kesalahan, tindakan,dan efek samping tindakan. Terapi
mindfulness meditasi untuk tenaga kesehatan dalam meningkatkan keselamatan pasien.

50% of adverse events in patients can be prevented, this is because the majority of errors in patients are
related to human physiological factors, human cognitive and organizational perspectives. According to
WHO data, the incidence of unwanted side effects in patients worldwide is approximately 10%.
Nosocomial infections that have not been reported, errors in drug administration and other undesirable
conditions that have not been properly evaluated. The aim of the research is to determine the
implementation of patient safety. The research design used descriptive analytic with multistage random
sampling. The sample was 45 people according to the inclusion criteria. Research data collection uses a
questionnaire. The results showed that the distribution of negative work conflicts was 19 people (42.2%)
and positive conflicts were 26 people (57.8), the distribution of unprofessional managers was 19 people
(42.2%) and there were 26 professional managers. (57.8). The distribution of negative communication
was 19 people (42.2%) and positive communication was 26 people (57.8). Reports of an undesirable
incident said that 20 people (44.4%) said it was not reported, while 25 people (55.6%) said it was
reported. There were 14 people (31.1%) with low patient safety ratings and 31 people (68.9%) with high
patient safety ratings. The hospital work climate was not good as many as 22 people (48.9%) and 23
people (51.1%) said it was good. Conclusion: the need for a standardized learning experience includes a
text message with 3 questions designed to encourage discussion about identifying safety events and
reporting patient safety related events, implementing weekly patient safety records, the importance of
involving patients and families in identifying risks of clinical data errors, actions, and effects. next to the
action. Mindfulness meditation therapy is recommended for doctors, nurses and other health workers to
improve patient safety. It is recommended to implement patient safety applications t